skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 203439 Find in a Library
Title: Long Gun Registration: A Poorly Aimed Longshot
Journal: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice  Volume:45  Issue:4  Dated:October 2003  Pages:479-488
Author(s): Philip C. Stenning
Date Published: October 2003
Page Count: 10
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: This article discusses the myths and facts of gun control in Canada.
Abstract: One myth is that having a gun registry is something new for Canada. Canada has had a gun registry for years (since the 1930's) although for most of that time only handguns and certain other restricted firearms (including long guns) have required registration. The 1995 legislative requirements are that long guns be registered. The issue is not whether a gun registry should be retained, but whether there should be required registration of ordinary long guns rather than just licensing, as was the case prior to 1996. One of the reasons advanced for universal long gun registration has been that it will help police in investigating crimes and in taking precautions when responding to certain “gun” calls. But the public has not been informed of how frequently the police made such requests, what proportion of requests concern long guns, or what proportion concerned registration as opposed to gun owner licensing. The focus on crime prevention and reduction as the principal justification for universal registration of “ordinary” long guns is questionable because these guns accounted for 10 or 11 times as many suicides as homicides during a 5 year period. The claim by the Health Minister that gun control measures saved 300 lives a year is unsupported by evidence. The fact that both firearms homicides and firearms suicides began their decline long before the requirement for long gun registration was introduced suggests strongly that if this decline was influenced by gun control measures at all, it is most likely to have been influenced by measures such as long gun owner licensing, safe storage requirements, and introduction of enhanced firearms training requirements. The question is not whether this intervention will achieve the desired results, but whether the investment of public funds in that intervention will achieve better results than other possible interventions. 16 notes, 17 references
Main Term(s): Firearms acts
Index Term(s): Arms or ammunition security; Canada; Firearms deaths; Gun Control; Handguns; Laws and Statutes; Weapons violations
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.