skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 203544 Find in a Library
Title: When an Informant's Tip Gives Officers Probable Cause to Arrest Drug Traffickers
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:72  Issue:12  Dated:December 2003  Pages:8-21
Author(s): Edward M. Hendrie J.D.
Date Published: December 2003
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the requirements and circumstances under which an informant’s information can provide probable cause for police officers to arrest.
Abstract: A case study is provided that illustrates the complexities involved in using police informants to provide probable cause for an arrest. The case involves the arrest of a drug trafficking suspect who was identified by a police informant days before the arrest. In an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, the defendant argued that the information acted upon by the arresting police officers was heresay, and therefore the evidence obtained from such heresay should be inadmissible in court. The second argument made by the defendant was that even if the heresay could be considered, it was insufficient to establish probable cause, making his arrest unlawful. The Supreme Court ruled that the officers would have been derelict in their duties had they not acted on the informant’s tip. The Aquilar-Spinelli two-prong test for determining when informant information establishes probable cause is discussed. The first prong assesses the credibility of the informant, while the second prong assesses the informant’s basis of knowledge. The credibility and reliability of informants is discussed at length, including the fact that an informant can be considered credible when they have a strong motive to be truthful, even when prior information provided to police has been inaccurate. The author cites the case United States v. Carter to illustrate how an informant may be considered credible despite a lack of an established track record for reliability. The use of concerned citizen informants and anonymous tips to establish probable cause for police officers is also reviewed, with several court cases provided as illustration. Citizen informant information easily establishes probable cause to arrest with only the slightest corroboration, while anonymous tips require some exacting corroboration of the information. The key in these cases is that the concerned citizens’ identity is known to the police, whereas the identity of the anonymous tip giver is unknown. As such, in light of many court rulings on the lawfulness of arrests and admissibility of evidence, it has been well established that a tip by an informant, along with some degree of corroborating evidence, provides probable cause to arrest. Endnotes
Main Term(s): Informants; Probable cause
Index Term(s): Arrest procedures; Evidence; Hearsay evidence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.