skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 203850 Find in a Library
Title: Civilian Oversight of Police in Philadelphia: The First 50 Years
Author(s): Bruria Tal
Date Published: November 2003
Page Count: 28
Sponsoring Agency: Philadelphia Police Advisory Cmssn
Philadelphia, PA 19105-0147
Sale Source: Philadelphia Police Advisory Cmssn
P.O. Box 147
Philadelphia, PA 19105-0147
United States of America
Type: Historical Overview
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper traces Philadelphia's history and experience with the civilian oversight of police, beginning in the 1950's as a "pioneering venture" to the present (2003).
Abstract: Mayor J. Richardson Dilworth established the Police Review Board by executive order in October 1958. The Board accepted complaints against police, ascertained their validity, and recommended disciplinary action to the police department. The Board had no subpoena power. In 1967 a city judge ruled that Mayor Dilworth's creation of the Board had been illegal. The State Supreme Court reversed this decision years later, but the mayor decided to let the police commissioner handle police abuse complaints. Between 1969 and 1994 complaints were filed mostly through the police department's Internal Affairs Division. By 1992 Philadelphia's issues of police-community relations resembled the nationwide issues of increasing allegations of police misconduct. The Coalition of Police Accountability (CPA), representing about 30 community and legal groups, was established to end police abuse against citizens. The CPA proposed a permanent police advisory board to investigate citizens' complaints against police and to review police policies and practices. On June 10, 1993, the City Council, overriding the mayor's veto, passed Bill no. 317 to create a Police Advisory Board, and Bill no. 297, which defined police department complaint handling procedures. The Police Advisory Commission was established January 1, 1994, to improve police community relations and to investigate individual civilian complaints against police. Over the 10 years following its creation, the Commission faced some challenges that threatened its existence, as relations with the police department posed some critical problems over the years. The Fraternal Order of Police mounted legal challenges to the existence of the Commission and continued to oppose the Commission even after the Commission's mandate had been reinforced by court decisions. Between 1994 and 2003, the Commission initiated or completed numerous public panel hearings on citizens' complaints against police. The notion of police accountability that provides the base for the Commission's existence and operations has been steadily gaining public recognition in the wake of publicity about several local and national high-profile incidents that have involved police brutality, corruption, racial profiling, and shootings. Civilian review emphasizes that the police department, like other government agencies, is accountable to the citizenry, and that mutual respect and cooperation are essential for improving police-community relations. 52 references and appended description of community lines of police accountability and sample complaint forms
Main Term(s): Complaints against police
Index Term(s): Accountability; Civilian Review Boards; History of policing; Pennsylvania; Police misconduct
Note: Downloaded January 23, 2004. Host URL disabled (recorded 10/11/2007).
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.