skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 203979 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support (CLEFS), Executive Summary and Final Report
Author(s): Renee Edel
Corporate Author: Cuyahoga Cty Juvenile Court
United States of America
Date Published: December 2003
Page Count: 147
Sponsoring Agency: Cuyahoga Cty Juvenile Court
Cleveland, OH 44115
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 2000-FS-VX-K001
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Cuyahoga Cty Juvenile Court
2163 East 22nd Street
Cleveland, OH 44115
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report describes the implementation and evaluation of the Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Juvenile Court's project to identify and improve the ability of both probation and detention officers to address individual, family, and organizational stress before the stress becomes debilitating; this project was conducted under a Federal Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support (CLEFS) grant (June 1999).
Abstract: At the time the Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court applied for the CLEFS grant, the court was experiencing a period of wide-scale administrative changes that began in January 1998 and continued through 2000. The court had also experienced increases in both the volume of the complaints and the severity of the offenses committed by the youth coming before it. These changes were expected to increase the level of stress among the workers. In addition to these circumstantial stressors, it became apparent from a literature review that relatively little was known about the nature of the stress experienced by juvenile corrections officers and even less was known about juvenile probation officers' stress. The objectives of the project were to identify sources and symptoms of stress and identify available personal and organizational resources for treating stress among officers and their families; to increase staff morale and the level of job satisfaction; to decrease the incidence of staff turnover, medical leaves, and absenteeism; and to increase the level of family satisfaction. Additional project objectives were to enhance the ability of managers to recognize the signs of stress among officers and to increase managers' skills/comfort in assisting officers with stress-related problems. The evaluation measured types of stress and coping assets, attitudes about the work environment, work attendance, and post-program satisfaction. The most helpful aspects of the programs were in coping with personal problems/stressors as well as work-related problems/stressors. Overall, the program did reduce stress among employees. Workers involved in the pilot program expressed a need for acknowledgement from the administration, and the wellness programs met that need. It also taught new skills and provided officers with the chance to network with colleagues both in and outside their departments; however, these benefits may be short-lived if no further actions are taken to capitalize on the information obtained through the program. Activities that must be instituted and maintained are charting a clear direction for the court, communicating with employees about this direction, involving employees in decisionmaking whenever possible, conducting limited training for the administration, and developing a means to recognize employee effort regularly. 8 tables and appended evaluation instruments
Main Term(s): Corrections management
Index Term(s): Behavior under stress; Correctional officer stress; Correctional stress training; Corrections occupational stress; NIJ final report; Ohio; Probation officer attitudes; Stress assessment; Stress management; Work attitudes
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=203979

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.