skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 204124 Find in a Library
Title: National Crisis in Juvenile Indigent Defense
Journal: Juvenile Justice Update  Volume:9  Issue:1  Dated:February/March 2003  Pages:1-2,14,15
Author(s): Patricia Puritz
Date Published: February 2003
Page Count: 4
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article addresses problems associated with the access to counsel and quality of representation afforded to children since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1967, establishing the constitutional right to counsel for children in delinquency proceedings and responses to these identified problems.
Abstract: Thirty-five years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued a historic decision establishing a constitutional right to counsel for children in delinquency proceedings (In re Gault, 1967), thereby changing the course of juvenile justice and forcing States to put in place a process and a system for delivering legal services to children. Similarly, Congress expressed concern over safeguarding children’s rights and enacted the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act in 1974. Yet, even with these landmark decisions and acts, the right to counsel in delinquency proceedings has not been fully realized. Since In re Gault, studies have shown that many children have gone through the juvenile justice system without the benefit of counsel and the access to quality of representation they receive is, at best, uneven. Problems identified with the delivery of defense services include: (1) juvenile defense services are routinely chaotic and underfunded; (2) there is a high incidence of youth waiving right to counsel and the clarity of plea bargains; (3) overextending the role of probation officers; and (4) low standards impact and create a lack of professionalism. To solve these problems at the State and local levels, it requires a shared commitment among the parties in the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government. Responses to these identified problems have included: the formation of the National Juvenile Defender Training, Technical Assistance and Resource Center, the establishment of regional centers to ensure access to competent counsel, and the National Center’s Juvenile Defender Leadership Summit which includes training, networking, organizing, and strategic planning. Together all branches of government play a part in the design and delivery of juvenile indigent defense services and systems.
Main Term(s): Juvenile court procedures
Index Term(s): Defender systems; Defense counsel; Defense services; Indigents; Juvenile courts; Juvenile due process; Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act; Right to counsel; Rights of minors; Rights of the accused; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.