skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 204197 Find in a Library
Title: Restitution and Restorative Justice in Juvenile Justice and School Discipline
Journal: Youth Studies Australia  Volume:22  Issue:4  Dated:December 2003  Pages:44-51
Author(s): Barry A. Fields
Date Published: December 2003
Page Count: 8
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This paper examines the concept and process of restitution within legislation and how restitution is used by the Australian justice system as a response to youth crime.
Abstract: In an effort to respond to seemingly ever-increasing youth crime problems, government, community care programs, police, schools, and the juvenile justice system in Australia are collaborating to find effective ways of intervening with youth crime. Restitution as one path to the rehabilitation of youthful offenders developed out of this collaboration. Court-ordered restitution has become a significant feature of sentencing regimes for both juvenile and adult offenders, which represents the emerging belief that offenders should be held accountable for their crimes and that victims of crime deserve compensation. There is a growing body of research indicating that substantial reductions in juvenile recidivism have co-occurred with the use of court-ordered restitution. Drawing on this success, the concept of restitution can be seen outside of the formal justice system, such as within school behavior management policies where informal restitution mechanisms have historically been used by teachers. A case study of a 14-year-old girl with multiple disciplinary problems is offered to illustrate how the concept and process of restitution functions. In this case, a restitution plan was created by the offender herself, the restitution plan met the expectations of the victim, and resulted in the restoration of key relationships in the life of the offender. Thus, a strong positive outcome was affected through the use of a restorative justice model. Restorative justice models represent a different way of viewing crime in which any criminal act is primarily viewed as a conflict between individuals resulting in harm to victims and, ultimately, to offenders themselves. Within Australia, the type of restorative justice most often offered is the community conferencing model, in which the people involved in the conflict are brought together to help heal the damage. Compared to more traditional justice models, restorative justice has been found to be more effective at achieving standard judicial goals. Restorative justice may offer much-needed solutions to juvenile crime, however, public opinion based on media coverage of juvenile crime tends to support a more punitive view of punishment versus treatment. It is hoped that media depictions of juvenile crime will offer a more balanced view and the issues surrounding youth crime. References
Main Term(s): Juvenile offenders; Restorative Justice
Index Term(s): Australia; Foreign juvenile justice systems; Foreign policies; Treatment intervention model
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.