skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 204213 Find in a Library
Title: Does the Confession Criterion in Case Selection Inflate Polygraph Accuracy Estimate?
Journal: Polygraph  Volume:32  Issue:4  Dated:2003  Pages:234-244
Author(s): Donald J. Krapohl; Kendall W. Shull; Andrew H. Ryan
Date Published: 2003
Page Count: 11
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses polygraph detectibility of guilty confessing suspects and guilty suspects that did not confess but were caught by other means.
Abstract: Many polygraph studies have relied on confessions as verification of ground truth. Some critics argue that this creates an overestimation of polygraph accuracy because there is a relationship between polygraph results and the likelihood that a suspect will confess. Among guilty suspects, there could be qualitative group differences between confession and nonconfession cases. In this study, a comprehensive sample of field polygraph cases from a large United States government polygraph program was examined to uncover differences in the polygraph detectibility of guilty confessing suspects, and guilty suspects that did not confess but were caught by other means. The goal was to determine whether there were differences in scores and decisions attributable to the confession criterion. Though none were found, the confession criterion remains a potential source of contamination in undercontrolled studies. The present data demonstrate that it is an overstatement to broadly assert that the confession criterion is a contaminant in a study. The confession criterion is suspected when it leads to samples of cases with nonrepresentative data, such as those with scores more extreme than the population as a whole. It should be relatively straightforward for researchers to collect and report such evidence as others have done so that skewed data can be recognized. 1 footnote, 1 figure, 4 tables, 19 references
Main Term(s): Confessions; Polygraph reliability
Index Term(s): Accountability; Alibis; Data integrity; Polygraph techniques; Polygraphs; Psychological stress evaluator
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=204213

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.