skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 204265 Find in a Library
Title: Mental Health Issues & the Criminal Law: A Case of Asperger's Disorder
Journal: Judicial Officers' Bulletin  Volume:15  Issue:9  Dated:October 2003  Pages:75-78,82
Author(s): Dan Howard
Date Published: October 2003
Page Count: 5
Type: Case Study
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This case study of how New South Wales (Australia) law deals with complex mental health issues illustrates how the law and the mental health sciences continue to have significant problems in reconciling their views on managing cases that involve mentally ill victims.
Abstract: The case reviewed involved a number of charges of indecent assault in the form of unwanted and explicit fondling and touching. The defendant was a caregiver at a special home, and the victim was a 22 year-old young woman under his care and supervision. The victim suffered from Asperger's Disorder, as well as a supervening schizophrenia that was generally well controlled by medication, epilepsy, and bed-wetting. Asperger's Disorder is a disorder that affects social relationships, such that the afflicted person has difficulty appreciating the social significance of others' intentions as well as their own intentions and feelings in the dynamics of a relationship. Asperger's sufferers tend to think and describe experiences in very literal, black-and-white terms. In the application of New South Wales law pertinent to the special protection from sexual assault of persons suffering from "intellectual disability," the prosecution in the case could not so classify the victim's disability. It relied upon the defendant being portrayed as a "person in authority" over the victim to establish an aggravating circumstance. This further required that the victim be viewed legally as a "normal" person who did not consent to the indecent assaults upon her by the defendant. The defense in turn submitted evidence that the defendant's depression decreased his ability to be sensitive to what other people's communications meant. The jury found the defendant guilty on three of the five counts of indecent assault, and he was sentenced to 2 1/2 years of imprisonment, with a nonparole period of 1 year and 3 months, to be served through periodic detention. This article advises that the law failed to take into account the kind of disability suffered by the victim, a disability that clearly increased her vulnerability to sexual victimization. An expansion of the nature of disabilities that make persons vulnerable to sexual victimization is recommended. 6 notes
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Foreign laws; Law reform; Persons with cognitive disabilities; Sex offenses; Sexual assault victims; Socially challenged
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=204265

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.