skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 204393 Find in a Library
Title: Hate Speech and Constitutional Protection: Priming Values of Equality and Freedom
Journal: Journal of Social Issues  Volume:58  Issue:2  Dated:Summer 2002  Pages:247-263
Author(s): Gloria Cowan; Miriam Resendez; Elizabeth Marshall; Ryan Quist
Date Published: 2002
Page Count: 17
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the effects on related attitudes and values of raising an individual's consciousness of either the harm of hate speech or the importance of free speech.
Abstract: Because both the value of free speech and the harm of hate speech have a place in the ethical system of most Americans, this study hypothesized that priming on one or the other principle would increase the salience, and hence the influence, of that primed value on attitudes toward the harm of hate speech and freedom of speech as aspects of the values of equality and freedom. Study participants were 169 college students (67 Caucasians, 50 Hispanics, 21 African-Americans, 16 Asian-Americans, and 15 "others"). Forty-six participants were male and 122 were female. The equal-protection prime consisted of a statement followed by specific questions that addressed the harm of hate speech and the benefits of limiting it. The freedom-of-speech prime consisted of a statement followed by specific questions that focused on the importance of freedom of speech and the costs of censorship. Participants in both prime conditions were first presented with a definition of hate speech as follows: "Hate speech has been defined as a generic term that has come to embrace the use of speech attacks based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, and sexual orientation or preference." The effects of the priming conditions were examined by having participants make assessments of scenarios with hate speech that targeted homosexuals, Blacks, and women. Participants were then asked to complete a value survey adapted from Rokeach's original Value Survey (1968). The study found that an individual's attitude toward issues of free speech and harm of hate speech was determined in part by that value most impressed upon their conscious awareness. Relative to the control group, the freedom-of-speech prime was more effective than the equal-protection prime in affecting scores on the Freedom of Speech Scale, the juxtaposition of freedom of speech and harm of speech, and responses to the scenarios. If people are reminded of the value of free speech, they may tend to minimize the harm of hate speech, hold the perpetrator less accountable, and emphasize the costs of censorship. People primed to value the harm of hate speech, on the other hand, may be more inclined to support restrictions on speech that inflicts psychological harm and fosters a climate for hate crimes. Study limitations and alternative explanations of the findings are discussed. 3 tables and 30 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Discrimination; Equal Protection; Freedom of speech; Hate Crimes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.