skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 204551 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Kentucky - Advancing Justice: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings
Corporate Author: American Bar Assoc
Juvenile Justice Ctr
United States of America

Children's Law Ctr, Inc
United States of America
Editor(s): Patricia Puritz; Kim Brooks
Date Published: September 2002
Page Count: 77
Sponsoring Agency: American Bar Assoc
Washington, DC 20005
Children's Law Ctr, Inc
Covington, KY 41011
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 1999-JN-FX-0003
Sale Source: American Bar Assoc
Juvenile Justice Ctr
740 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study assessed the accessibility and quality of Kentucky's legal defense services for indigent juveniles brought into the juvenile justice system.
Abstract: In addition to surveys of juvenile judges and indigent defense counsel across the State, nearly 170 juveniles in detention and treatment facilities were interviewed about their experience in the juvenile court system and their experiences with attorneys. Site visits were conducted in a number of juvenile courts, and interviews were conducted with parents of the juveniles, the juveniles, judges, juvenile justice workers, social workers, attorneys, and others involved in case processing. Numerous interviews were conducted with "key stakeholders" with long-term involvement and perspective on juvenile justice issues in the State, including those who were instrumental in reform initiatives over the years. The study found that although average caseloads of indigent juvenile clients had been reduced for trial attorneys statewide, some counties reported juvenile caseloads far in excess of national standards for such caseloads. With few exceptions, most juveniles interviewed had been represented by counsel for the charges that led to their incarceration, but interviews with juveniles and families in the community during site visits found that wavier of counsel was more prevalent among nondetained juveniles. Procedures were insufficient to ensure early access to counsel, and informal adjustments and/or plea agreements were the most frequent disposition. Under various reform efforts, motion practice by defense attorneys has apparently improved, along with postdisposition advocacy; however, there is limited advocacy for case dispositions tailored to the best interests of the juvenile. The assessment identified a number of systemic barriers faced by defense attorneys, local courts, and others in ensuring access to counsel and quality representation for juveniles. Thirteen recommendations are addressed to the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy and its local defender offices, and 6 recommendations directed to State and local agencies encourage working collaboratively to address issues in the juvenile justice system. Other recommendations are addressed to the courts, law schools, media, and State and local bar associations. 112 notes and an appended list of key stakeholders interviewed
Main Term(s): Juvenile processing
Index Term(s): Defense; Defense counsel; Defense counsel effectiveness; Defense preparation; Defense services; Indigent Defense; Indigents; Juvenile offenders; Kentucky; OJJDP grant-related documents; Right to counsel; State juvenile justice systems; State juvenile laws
Note: Downloaded March 10, 2004.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.