skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 204693 Find in a Library
Title: Aviation Security: Challenges Delay Implementation of Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System
Author(s): Norman J. Rabkin; David A. Powner
Corporate Author: US Government Accountability Office
United States of America
Date Published: March 2004
Page Count: 25
Sponsoring Agency: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
US Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20013
US Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548
Publication Number: GAO-04-504T
Sale Source: US Government Accountability Office
P.O. Box 37050
Washington, DC 20013
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Annual/Periodic)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents information on the development status of the new Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System (CAPPS II) and reviews the challenges to its implementation.
Abstract: In the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks in the United States, Congress passed the Aviation and Transportation Security Act, which required that a computer-assisted passenger screening system be implemented for the evaluation of all passengers. The Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Office of National Risk Assessment became responsible for developing CAPPS II. It is anticipated that CAPPS II will significantly improve the security of air travel. However, the General Accounting Office (GAO) found that important system planning activities by TSA in the development of CAPPS II have been delayed. TSA is behind schedule in testing and developing initial increments of CAPPS II, mainly due to delays in obtaining passenger data because of privacy concerns. Furthermore, TSA is behind schedule in establishing a plan for specific system functionality, delivery, and cost. TSA has only addressed only one of eight issues identified by Congress as main areas of interest related to the development, operation, and public acceptance of the system. Challenges facing the development and implementation of CAPPS II include questions about the accuracy of data, abuse prevention, preventing unauthorized access, international cooperation, managing expansion of the system, and preventing identity theft. If left unresolved, these issues threaten the successful deployment of the system. A previous GAO report on the development of CAPPS II recommended that TSA create guidelines for maintaining the focus of the project and reaching intended system results by identifying the specific functionality that will be delivered during each increment of CAPPS II, as well as its associated milestones for completion and its costs. It was also recommended that TSA create a schedule for critical security activities, a strategy for lower risks associated with system and database testing, and an oversight mechanism that enhances the protection of the system from misuse. The additional development of results-oriented performance goals would further ensure that the system operates as it should. Figures, appendix
Main Term(s): Aircraft security; Airport security
Index Term(s): Security systems; Transportation Infrastructure Protection; US Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Note: Testimony before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives; downloaded March 17, 2004.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.