skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 210132 
Title: Empirical Research Relevant to Sentencing Frameworks (From Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, P 59-82, 2004, Anthony Bottoms, Sue Rex, et al. eds. -- See NCJ-210129)
Author(s): Anthony Bottoms
Date Published: 2004
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.isbs.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter explores the general topic of empirical research relevant to sentencing frameworks.
Abstract: Empirical evidence was used to judge whether previous assessments, specifically the 2001 Halliday Report and 2004 Civitas Report of the potential of sentencing frameworks to contribute to crime reduction and public confidence remain sound. This chapter revisits this empirical research evidence on the extent to which criminal justice systems can, through adjustments in their sentencing framework, achieve reductions in crime by means of reform/rehabilitation, deterrence, or incapacitation. In addition, the chapter addresses concern over evidence published by the Home Office showing that the altered structural arrangements of the new, post 1998, English youth justice system have substantially reduced reoffending and concern over the extent to which sentences specifically designed as alternatives to prison really are applied to persons who would otherwise be sent to prison. Tables, notes, and references
Main Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Foreign sentencing statistics; Research; Sentence effectiveness; Sentencing reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=210132

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.