skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 210357 Find in a Library
Title: Images of Danger and Culpability: Racial Stereotyping, Case Processing, and Criminal Sentencing
Journal: Criminology  Volume:43  Issue:2  Dated:May 2005  Pages:435-468
Author(s): Sara Steen; Rodney L. Engen; Randy R. Gainey
Date Published: May 2005
Page Count: 34
Publisher: http://www.asc41.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study developed and tested a theory that bridges the gap between individual and organizational case processing, with attention to sentencing for drug offenses in Washington State, in order to better understand the role of race in criminal sentencing processes.
Abstract: The theory of drug-offender sentencing developed and tested draws on two bodies of theory in the literature on sentencing and racial disparity. The first, called the "racial stereotypes" approach, emphasizes the importance of racial stereotypes in the assessment of individual offenders. The second, called the "case processing" approach, focuses less on racial-ethnic disparities than on routine processing criteria set in an organizational context. The theory was tested by examining all sentences ordered for Black and White offenders convicted of felony drug offenses between July 1, 1995, and December 31, 1998, in Washington State (n=22,858). The dependent variables were "incarceration," as measured by whether an individual was sentenced to more than 30 days of incarceration, and sentence length, as measured by term of confinement in months. Independent variables were being male, being a dealer, and having a prior felony record. The study found that White offenders who most closely resembled the stereotype of a "dangerous" drug offender (being a male drug dealer with a prior felony record) received significantly harsher sentences than other White drug offenders who did not fit this stereotype. On the other hand, being a "dealer" had a significantly larger effect on the likelihood of incarceration for White offenders than for Black offenders. Being both a dealer and having a prior felony record also had significantly larger effects on sentence length for White offenders than for Black offenders. In the less serious categories of offenders (nondealers and male nondealers with no priors), however, judges were less likely to incarcerate White offenders than their Black counterparts. 6 tables and 39 references
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Drug offenders; Judicial discretion; Racial discrimination; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing factors; Sentencing/Sanctions; Washington
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=210357

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.