skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 210442 Find in a Library
Title: Supreme Court and Police Practices: The Unusually Busy 2003-2004 Term
Journal: American Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:29  Issue:2  Dated:Spring 2005  Pages:247-267
Author(s): Jack E. Call
Date Published: 2005
Page Count: 21
Publisher: HTML 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court in its 2003-2004 term that relate to police practices.
Abstract: These decisions are first placed in recent historical perspective, followed by a brief discussion of the six least significant decisions on police practices from the last term of the Supreme Court. The five most important of these cases are discussed in more detail. The paper concludes with a discussion of the policy implications of the cases decided in the 2003-2004 term, which is judged by the author to be the most important term for police practices in the last decade. The Court decided 11 cases that addressed issues in police practices. The author deems several of these cases to be among the most important of the cases relevant to police practices over the last 9 years. The Court upheld the arrest of all the occupants of a car when drugs are found in it; permitted police roadblocks designed to obtain information from the public in certain circumstances; refused to suppress physical evidence obtained from Miranda violations; expanded the availability of warrantless car searches incident to arrest to include arrest of recent occupants of the car; and upheld statutes that require persons stopped based on reasonable suspicion to identify themselves. The justices' voting patterns in these cases are reviewed. 1 table, 5 references, and 38 cited court cases
Main Term(s): US Supreme Court decisions
Index Term(s): Arrest procedures; Confessions; Miranda rights; Roadblocks; Stop and frisk; Vehicle searches; Vehicle stops; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.