skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 211432 Find in a Library
Title: Fight Against Terrorism: The Lists and the Gaps
Journal: Utrecht Law Review  Volume:1  Issue:1  Dated:September 2005  Pages:97-125
Author(s): Imelda Tappeiner
Date Published: September 2005
Page Count: 29
Document: PDF
Publisher: http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/ 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: After providing an overview of the counterterrorism resolutions of the United Nations Security Council, measures taken to implement these resolutions by the European Union and by individual nations are discussed, followed by a core discussion of the rights of the citizen in international and national forums in challenging placement on a terrorist list without legal means to challenge the listing.
Abstract: There is a tension between implementing resolutions of the U.N. Security Council and simultaneously respecting human rights embedded in national constitutions and other international treaties. This tension is also evident when the United Nations lists the persons against whom counterterrorism sanctions should be imposed under its resolutions. The courts can examine whether the sanctions in themselves may contain a violation of human rights or whether they are to be applied in compliance with human rights requirements; however, the issue of whether placing persons on the list could in itself be a violation of human rights is a more complex matter. Access to the courts to contest such resolutions or lists is impossible for private individuals. In dealing with this gap in human rights in European states, the first step should be for the Council of Europe to change the obscure way in which persons, organizations, and entities are placed on terrorist lists. At a minimum, this means developing objective criteria for assessing whether to place a person or organization on the list, so as to prevent as much arbitrariness as possible. There should certainly be a restriction on the unquestioning adoption of names from the lists of the U.S. presidential executive orders and from the lists of the 1276 Committee. A second step should be a "delisting" procedure introduced at the level of the European Union.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Counter-terrorism tactics; European Convention on Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; Human rights; International agreements; International cooperation; International law; International terrorism; Right to Due Process; United Nations (UN); United Nations standards
Note: Downloaded September 27, 2005.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=232699

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.