skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 211561 Find in a Library
Title: Too Late for Luck: A Comparison of Post-Furman Exonerations and Executions of the Innocent
Journal: Crime & Delinquency  Volume:51  Issue:4  Dated:October 2005  Pages:498-520
Author(s): Talia Roitberg Harmon; William S. Lofquist
Date Published: October 2005
Page Count: 23
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study involved a quantitative analysis of the characteristics of 97 post-Furman cases of convicted capital defendants whose cases had compelling evidence of innocence, with 81 being exonerated and 16 executed.
Abstract: Whether exonerated or executed, defendants were defined as innocent only on the basis of compelling evidence that they were not involved in any element of the murder for which they were convicted. Independent variables related to these cases were identified through reference to the literature on the causes of wrongful convictions, as well as through an examination of the appellate records of these cases. Based on this information, researchers developed a data-collection instrument that was administered to respondents directly involved in these cases. In the cases of the executed defendants, the questionnaire probed respondents' views about the innocence claim and the factors that contributed to the original wrongful conviction and to the failure to detect this error prior to execution. Logistic regression analyses found that the following variables were significant predictors of case outcome (exoneration compared to executions): allegations of perjury, multiple types of evidence, prior felony record, type of attorney at trial, and race of the defendant. These findings identify significant problems with the administration of capital punishment that stem primarily from the quality of the case record created at trial. The postconviction discovery of new evidence was unrelated to case outcomes, suggesting that the absence of a developed trial record compromises the opportunity to reverse a wrongful conviction. This is confirmed by the finding that representation by private counsel at trial was significantly related to subsequent exoneration; whereas, the advantages of private counsel at appeal were not associated with case outcomes. 5 tables, 8 notes, and 71 references
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Appeal procedures; Attorney competence; Capital punishment; Death row inmates; Wrongful conviction; Wrongful incarceration
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.