skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 211815 Find in a Library
Title: This Is One Crime That Didn't Compute
Corporate Author: National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC)
United States of America
Date Published: 1999
Page Count: 1
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC)
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
Sale Source: National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC)
700 N. Frederick Ave.
Bldg. 181, Room 1L30
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Case Study
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes the investigative techniques used by the Financial Crimes Division of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) in arresting and achieving a 99-percent conviction rate in cases that involved a group of regular users of methamphetamine who were engaged in various types of check fraud and forgery that had victimized thousands of people and businesses.
Abstract: An informant supplied a detective in the Financial Division with the street names ("monikers") of 25 to 50 members of the group, which worked mainly out of the Hollywood area. Since the informant indicated that all members of the groups were regular users of methamphetamine, the financial-crimes detective worked with a narcotics detective in Hollywood in the investigation of the cases. The moniker was the starting point of the investigation of each individual. A moniker was linked to a location, which was placed under surveillance. Probable cause and the subsequent search warrant typically focused on some type of drug involvement. After booking the suspect on drug charges, a forgery warrant would be issued based on evidence seized from the suspect's house. The recovering of stolen mail carrying checks prompted a referral to a U.S. Postal Inspector, who then filed Federal charges. Group members were able to design, print, and cash counterfeit checks by using a computer program. Seized computers were transferred to the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC)-West, which used its resources and expertise to retrieve incriminating evidence of drug deals, forgeries, and credit card fraud. The investigation, which is ongoing, has produced more than 200 arrests and cleared several hundred cases of fraud, some dating as far back as 1993.
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): California; Check fraud; Computer evidence; Computer related crime; Credit card fraud; Drug law enforcement; Drug law offenses; Forgery; Investigative techniques
Note: From TechBeat, Winter 1999; downloaded October 24, 2005.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.