skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 211971 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Supermax Prisons
Author(s): Daniel P. Mears
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: June 2005
Page Count: 123
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
The Urban Institute
Washington, DC 20037
Grant Number: 2002-IJ-CX-0019
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents an evaluation of the goals and the unintended impacts of super-maximum security prisons.
Abstract: Super-maximum security prisons were rare just 20 years ago but today over two-thirds of States house over 20,000 inmates in “supermax” correctional facilities. In the face of mounting criticisms regarding the high costs of supermax prisons and the notion that confinement within them is unconstitutional and inhumane, it is necessary to examine the stated goals of supermax prisons, how the goals are achieved, and the unintended outcomes associated with the goals. Urban Institute researchers undertook a systematic review of the research literature, corrections agency reports, and news and legal accounts of supermax prisons. Data also included site visits to 3 States, interviews with 60 corrections leaders in 11 States, and national survey data collected from wardens. A benefit-cost analysis (BCA) policy brief and tool was also created using data from practitioners and researchers. Results of statistical analyses indicated considerable differences regarding the stated and perceived goals of supermax prisons, although the national warden survey data indicated vast agreement about four critical goals: increasing safety, order, and control throughout the prison system and incapacitating violent or disruptive inmates. The logic by which these prisons seek to achieve their goals is unclear and there are a wide range of unintended effects of supermax prisons, such as an increase in inmate mental illness, many of which remain contentious. States have yet to conduct benefit-cost analyses of their supermax prisons and it thus remains unclear whether the benefits of supermax prisons outweigh their high costs. Future research should examine inmate outcomes upon release from supermax prisons, such as success gaining housing and employment and integrating back into the community. References, appendixes, tables
Main Term(s): Criminal justice evaluation; Maximum security
Index Term(s): Cost/Benefit Analysis; NIJ grant-related documents; Prison costs; Prison management
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.