skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 211990 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Contracting for Imprisonment in the Federal Prison System: Cost and Performance of the Privately Operated Taft Correctional Institution
Author(s): Douglas C. McDonald Ph.D.; Kenneth Carlson
Corporate Author: Abt Associates, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: October 2005
Page Count: 173
Sponsoring Agency: Abt Associates, Inc
Cambridge, MA 02138
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
Grant Number: 1999-IJ-CX-K018
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study determined the cost-effectiveness of the implementation of a contract between the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the Wackenhut Corrections Corporation in 1997 to manage and operate a new government-owned, low-security correctional facility in Taft, CA.
Abstract: The study compared the cost of contracting for the facility's operation compared to what the BOP would have spent if it had operated the facility directly during its first 5 years (fiscal year 1998 through fiscal year 2002). Performance under the contract was also examined for the first 6 1/2 years. The cost analyses indicated that the Federal Government's cost in contracting for the Taft Correctional Institution's operation was lower between fiscal years 1998 through 2002 compared to what the BOP would have spent in operating the prison directly. On the most comprehensive and detailed measures of performance under contract requirements, the private firm performed at levels above and beyond compliance with the contract. Since BOP-operated correctional facilities do not operate under contract agreements as does the Taft facility, a complete matched comparison of how Taft's operation compared with the operations of BOP-operated facilities could not be made; however, a comparison of selected performance indicators that are the same for Taft and other Federal prisons yielded a mixed result. On some measures the Taft facility was better than the average observed at BOP-operated low-security prisons, while on other performance measures Taft was worse than the average. On still other measures, performance was approximately the same. The performance measures on which comparisons were made pertained to population management, security and facility management, correctional leadership and effective public administration, and inmate programs and services. Extensive figures and tables
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Cost effectiveness analysis; Federal Bureau of Prisons; NIJ final report; Prison conditions; Prison management; Private sector-government cooperation; Privatization in corrections
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.