skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 212124 Find in a Library
Title: Adult Transfer Law Study
Author(s): Erica Turley; J. Norbert Federspiel; Harry N. Boone, Jr. Ph.D.; Lora Maynard-Booton; Angela Saunders
Corporate Author: West Virginia Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Ctr
Division of Criminal Justice Services
United States of America
Date Published: March 1999
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
Washington, DC 20531
West Virginia Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Ctr
Charleston, WV 25301
Grant Number: 97-MU-MU-K023
Sale Source: West Virginia Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Ctr
Division of Criminal Justice Services
1204 Kanawha Boulevard, East
Charleston, WV 25301
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents findings on a study designed to assess the impact of a July 1997 West Virginia law that restricts the ability of juveniles transferred to adult criminal jurisdiction to appeal the order of transfer.
Abstract: The West Virginia Code allows serious juvenile offenders as young as 14 years old to be transferred to adult criminal jurisdiction. An amendment to the law in 1995 made certain transfers mandatory while allowing judges discretion on other transfers. Another amendment in July 1997 limited the availability of an interlocutory appeal to juveniles transferred by a judge’s discretion. Mandatory transfers no longer have the right to directly appeal the order to transfer. The two-pronged study evaluated the impact of this law on juveniles and on juvenile justice practitioners. The first part of the study drew criminal justice data from 100 randomly selected juveniles who had committed transferable offenses both before and after the 1997 law change. The second part of the study surveyed 142 randomly selected juvenile justice practitioners regarding their opinions of the law. Results offer demographic and offense characteristics of juveniles and demographic characteristics of practitioners. Overall, practitioners were divided in their opinion of the law: more police, sheriffs, and prosecutors were in favor of expanding the number of offenses mandating transfer while more public defenders, probation officers, shelter workers, and judges were in favor of discretionary transfers. Tables, graphs
Main Term(s): Adult felony system; Serious juvenile offenders
Index Term(s): Appeal procedures; BJS Grant-related Documents; Legislation; West Virginia
Note: Downloaded November 18, 2005.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.