skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 215439     Find in a Library
  Title: Whiskey and the Wires: The Inadvisable Application of the Wire Fraud Statute to Alcohol Smuggling and Foreign Tax Evasion
  Author(s): Jason S. Friedman
  Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:96  Issue:3  Dated:Spring 2006  Pages:911 to 946
  Date Published: 2006
  Page Count: 36
  Annotation: This article critiques the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Pasquantino v. United States (2005), which holds that a scheme to defraud a foreign government of tax revenue violates the wire fraud statute and that the common law revenue rule does not preclude prosecutions for wire fraud violations that stem from such a scheme.
  Abstract: This ruling affirmed the convictions of three men who had been prosecuted under the wire fraud statute for a scheme to evade Canadian excise taxes by smuggling alcohol into Canada from the United States. The Supreme Court's decision is correct in asserting that the wire fraud statute does not undermine any well-established revenue-rule principle that bars prosecution for a scheme to evade foreign taxes; however, the Court's ruling is ultimately flawed, because a scheme to evade foreign taxes does not properly fall within the scope of the wire fraud statute. The legislative history of the wire fraud statute weighs against the Court's ruling, since the statute was drafted with a focus on domestic schemes and domestic injuries that result from misuse of United States wires. Moreover, the Court's decision departs from the Court's long-held presumption that Congress ordinarily intends for its sentences and restitution awards from wire fraud convictions for smuggling schemes to be calculated based on the combined impact of the domestic and extraterritorial conduct. Absent a clearer directive from Congress, the Court's decision grants an unwarranted extension of the wire fraud statute to conduct whose ultimate harms are in foreign jurisdictions covered by foreign laws. 257 footnotes
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Jurisdiction ; Fraud ; Smuggling/Trafficking ; Tax evasion ; US Supreme Court decisions ; Foreign laws ; Canada ; United States of America
  Publisher URL: 
  Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.