skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 217542 Find in a Library
Title: Relationship Between Crime and Objective Versus Subjective Strains
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:35  Issue:1  Dated:January/February 2007  Pages:81-87
Author(s): Giacinto Froggio; Robert Agnew
Date Published: January 2007
Page Count: 7
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study tested Agnew’s (General Strain Theory) arguments regarding objective and subjective strains and their relationship with crime.
Abstract: Support is found for Agnew’s argument that it is important to distinguish between objective and subjective strains. There is often much variation in the subjective evaluation of objective strains, although the extent of such variation depends on the strain being examined. In addition, there is some evidence that strains rated high in negativity are more likely to be associated with crime than those rated low in negativity. Agnew’s General Strain Theory (GST) has become one of the leading explanations of crime and delinquency. Agnew recently extended GST by arguing that some types of strain are more likely than others to result in crime. A core argument is that “subjective” strains are more strongly related to crime than “objective” strains. Objective strains refer to events and conditions that are disliked by most people in a given group. Subjective strains refer to events and conditions that are disliked by the people who have experienced them. In this study, Agnew argues that subjective strains should be more strongly associated with crime, since they are more likely to generate the negative emotions that lead to crime. Agnew’s arguments were tested with data from a sample of Italian youth. Tables, notes, and references
Main Term(s): Strain theory
Index Term(s): Crime Causes; Crime causes theory; Crime prediction
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.