skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 218507 Find in a Library
Title: From Delphi to Brussels, The Policy Context: Crime Prophecy, Proofing, Assessment
Journal: European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research  Volume:12  Issue:3-4  Dated:2006  Pages:213-220
Author(s): Nicholas Dorn; Michael Levi
Date Published: 2006
Page Count: 8
Publisher: http://www.springer.com 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: This article explores the prediction of unintended consequences emerging from legislative regulations in the European Union (EU).
Abstract: Legislative crime proofing in the EU consists of three main perspectives: (1) the broadest prospective; (2) impact assessment to reduce regulatory burdens on businesses; and (3) crime prevention and crime impact assessment. The broadest perspective means that crime proofing processes need to be simple and the language needs to be clear. The author notes that it is constructive to compare and contrast legislative crime proofing by using the Precautionary Principle, which concerns what may happen if legislative or other regulatory action is not taken and, in contrast, is taken. EU policymaking is based on the precautionary principle, yet without a specific reference to crime issues. The EU has taken an increasing interest in crime prevention over the past couple of decades, particularly in terms of organized crime and terrorism. The authors suggest that there is a need to clarify the relationship between legislative crime proofing and the broader Impact Assessment process. This is the case because Impact Assessment within the EU has taken on a decidedly security dimension and distinguishing between crime proofing and Impact Assessment will have implications for the methodologies adopted to examine the unintended consequences of legislative regulations. Footnotes, references
Main Term(s): Regulations; Regulatory offenses
Index Term(s): Crime prediction; European Union
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=240208

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.