skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 219234 Find in a Library
Title: Maritime and Port Security
Journal: Homeland Defense Journal  Volume:5  Issue:5  Dated:May 2007  Pages:30,32,34,35
Author(s): Don Philpott
Date Published: May 2007
Page Count: 4
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Justin Russell, director of port security for General Dynamics Information Technology, presents his appraisal of current U.S. port security and what is needed to improve it.
Abstract: Government and stakeholders in the maritime transportation system have made significant progress since September 11. The grant system has been effective in certain ways by bringing in technology and creating secure facilities; however, it is not nearly enough. An increase in port funding is required in order to provide the technology that is needed. Further, the integration of technology and security procedures must be based in risk-based modeling solutions. Risk assessment methodologies applied to each port help to identify and "red flag" those containers that have priority for further inspection. Total screening of all containers is not possible while maintaining a free flow of commerce. Maritime domain awareness is one of the security challenges facing U.S. ports. As facilities are increasingly secured, the ports still must rely on open waterways. This requires policing the variety of vessels and types of maritime traffic that pose potential threats to waterways and maritime access to ports. What is missing from port security plans is the tailoring of grants to an integrated system of port and waterway security that reflects a risk-based vision of security for each port and waterway. Under the current structure and policies, port priorities change every year depending on grant programs and what the legislature decides. Consequently, it is not possible to establish a long-term, integrated plan that is funded appropriately in accordance with a set timetable.
Main Term(s): Crime prevention planning
Index Term(s): Funding guidelines; Long range planning; Port and vessel security; River and marine policing; Security systems; Threat assessment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.