skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 219421 Find in a Library
Title: Attorney-Client Privilege Versus Mandatory Reporting by Psychologists: Dilemma, Conflict, and Solution
Journal: Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice  Volume:6  Issue:4  Dated:2006  Pages:69-78
Author(s): Joe W. Dixon Ph.D., J.D.; Kim Embleton Dixon Ph.D., MBA
Date Published: 2006
Page Count: 10
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper provides an overview of the legal and ethical responsibility for both psychologists and attorneys under mandatory child abuse reporting laws, with attention to the potential areas of conflict posed by the differing requirements for the two professions under these laws.
Abstract: In the United States, psychologists and a number of other professionals likely to encounter evidence of crimes are required by law to report to authorities their suspicion that a crime has occurred (e.g., child or elder abuse); however, only two States make attorneys subject to the mandatory reporting of child abuse. When a psychologist is hired as an employee or a consultant to an attorney, the psychologist is regarded as a "nonlawyer assistant" under the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). Under the MRPC, attorneys must make reasonable efforts to ensure that the nonlawyer's "conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer." There are no exceptions listed in the MRPC for breaching a client's confidence in order to report child abuse or any other past crimes of a client. On the other hand, under the MRPC, an attorney may not knowingly counsel or assist a client in conduct that is criminal or fraudulent. In all jurisdictions, an attorney cannot ethically or lawfully advise psychologists not to report child abuse. Once the psychologist believes with reasonable and good faith that child abuse has occurred, the mandatory reporting provisions of the law come into play. Ethical and legal conflicts can be avoided if both attorneys and the psychologists they hire inform clients who are considering psychological evaluations that any evidence of child abuse that emerges during the evaluation must be reported to the authorities by the psychologist. 14 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile victims
Index Term(s): Attorney client relations; Attorney work products; Child abuse; Child abuse reporting; Child abuse reporting statutes; Privileged communications; Professional conduct and ethics; Psychologists
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.