skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 219558 Find in a Library
Title: Final Technical Report: Habeas Litigation in U.S. District Courts: An Empirical Study of Habeas Corpus Cases Filed by State Prisoners Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (Executive Summary)
Author(s): Nancy J. King J.D.; Fred L. Cheesman II Ph.D.; Brian J. Ostrom Ph.D.
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
Grant Number: 2006-IJ-CX-0020
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study provides empirical information about the processing of habeas petitions filed in U.S District Courts by state prisoners under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA).
Abstract: This study found that, of the cases selected, habeas petitions in capital cases were filed an average of 7.4 years following state judgment; non-capital cases averaged 6.3 years before filing, longer than the average 5 years before AEDPA; 4% of capital cases were dismissed as time-barred under AEDPA’s statute of limitations, compared to 22% of non-capital cases; non-capital cases have averaged 11.5 months in federal court, capital cases have averaged 3.1 years (1 in 4 capital cases were still pending in late November 2006); of 1986 non-capital cases completed other than by transfer to another district, only 7 received relief; courts granted the writ in 33 of the 267 completed capital cases; and the location of the case had a significant relationship to both processing time and likelihood of relief, after controlling for case-level factors. Data were collected from 2,384 non-capital cases randomly selected from all non-capital habeas cases filed by state prisoners in federal district court during 2003 and 2004, and 368 capital cases started in 2000, 2001, and 2002 in the 13 districts with the highest volume of capital filings, which account for over 60% of the capital habeas filings nationwide. The study reports extensive descriptive information about the time elapsing from state sentence to federal filing, claims raised, the application of defenses and limitations, processing time, merits review, and outcome; compares processing of cases pre- and post-AEDPA, and compares the processing of capital cases to the processing of non-capital cases; and uses regression analysis to examine features associated with processing time for both capital and non-capital cases, features associated with the filing period for capital cases, and features associated with the likelihood of relief in capital cases.
Main Term(s): Courts
Index Term(s): Appeal procedures; Capital punishment; Death row inmates; Habeas corpus; Judicial decisions; Judicial process; Judicial review
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.