skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 219750 Find in a Library
Title: Utility of the Random Controlled Trial for Evaluating Sexual Offender Treatment: The Gold Standard or an Inappropriate Strategy?
Journal: Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment  Volume:19  Issue:2  Dated:June 2007  Pages:175-191
Author(s): W. L. Marshall; L. E. Marshall
Date Published: June 2007
Page Count: 17
Publisher: http://www.springer.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article explores the scientific, practical, and ethical issues involved with using the Random Controlled Trial (RCT) in the evaluation of sexual offender treatment.
Abstract: The authors conclude that the use of the RCT model is not ideal for assessing the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment. Moreover, the study most often held up as the model for the evaluation of sexual offender treatment, which was carried out by Marques et al. (2005), was found to have several methodological and analytical problems that reduce its relevance for the evaluation of sexual offender treatment. Two alternative strategies for evaluating sexual offender treatment were reviewed--incidental designs and actuarially-based evaluations--and were considered superior in the evaluation of sexual offender treatment effectiveness. Directors of sexual offender treatment programs are encouraged to adopt the two evaluation strategies here, or even alternative evaluation strategies, in place of the RCT evaluation model. In making this argument, the authors review the RCT design, which uses two key features: (1) the random allocation of treatment volunteers to either a treatment group or a no-treatment group, and (2) strict procedures for ensuring treatment integrity. While the scientific elegance of the RCT design is to be commended, the authors highlight problems with its design (random allocation of treatment groups), practicality, and ethical considerations. As illustration of the RCT model, California’s SOTEP study is critiqued, including its design flaws and treatment problems. Future research is encouraged in the area of evaluation of sexual offender treatment. References
Main Term(s): Evaluation of evaluation; Sex offender treatment
Index Term(s): Research design; Treatment effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=241544

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.