skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 219811 Find in a Library
Title: Abandonment of Items Associated with the Person
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:76  Issue:8  Dated:August 2007  Pages:23-32
Author(s): Jayme W. Holcomb J.D., Ed.D.
Date Published: August 2007
Page Count: 10
Document: HTML
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article explores the legal issues associated with items "abandoned" from an individual's immediate person, since this is a pertinent issue in determining the legality of the warrantless collection of incriminating, supposedly "abandoned" items.
Abstract: The fourth amendment gives individuals the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures regarding items on their person, in their homes, private papers, and personal effects. Warrants for searches and seizures of such items are required based upon the establishment of probable cause that a crime has been committed; however, a person has no privacy or possessory interest in property that is "abandoned," which means it can be seized and used as evidence without a search warrant. This article identifies and examines factors considered by courts in determining the status of an item as "abandoned." The two factors the courts consider to be most significant are disclaimers of ownership by the party of interest and the intentional physical discarding of the property. The conditions under which these factors do and do not constitute "abandonment" are described. Attention is given to the U.S. Supreme Court's requirement that the abandonment of an item must be voluntary before it can obtain the legal status of being abandoned. If an individual abandons an item of property as a result of improper police conduct, it is likely that the item will be excluded from evidence in a suppression hearing. In such cases, the court will analyze the behavior of the police in order to determine whether a fourth-amendment violation occurred prior to the abandonment of the item. Another circumstance examined is when defendants may argue that they attempted to re-establish possession of abandoned items. Such arguments are usually unsuccessful without clear evidence of efforts to reestablish personal possession. 58 notes
Main Term(s): Police legal training
Index Term(s): Police legal limitations; Search and seizure; Search and seizure laws; Search and seizure training; Search warrants; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.