skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220041 Find in a Library
Title: Use of Core Correctional Practices in Offender Reentry: The Delivery of Transitional Services and Prisoner Preparedness for Release
Author(s): Stephen M. Haas Ph.D.; Cynthia A. Hamilton M.S.
Corporate Author: Mountain State Criminal Justice Research Services
United States of America
Date Published: May 2007
Page Count: 46
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Mountain State Criminal Justice Research Services
Charleston, WV 25311
Grant Number: 2002-RE-CX-0062
Sale Source: Mountain State Criminal Justice Research Services
Charleston, WV 25311
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report--which is the third in a series of research publications on the results of an ongoing process evaluation of the West Virginia Offender Reentry Initiative (WVORI)--assesses whether offender prerelease services are being delivered in a manner consistent with key core correctional practices (CCP) that have been identified in research.
Abstract: Generally, study results indicate that the WVORI could benefit from greater adherence to CCP, which are rooted in staff characteristics and staff-inmate relationships that result in greater reductions in reoffending. A significant proportion of inmates felt that staff had not adequately helped them to develop a release plan that could work, did not view their problems realistically, and did not assist them in putting their release plans into action. Many inmates perceived that although there was a high level of structure in the prison regimen, the quality of the interpersonal relationship with staff was poor. Further, on every measure of CCP and transitional services, the performance of work release centers was equal to or better than that of general-population institutions. Generally, inmates in work release centers viewed staff as working more energetically to generate referrals and work with community organizations on their behalf. This finding suggests that corrections administrators should consider expanding the use of work release centers as "step-down" units for offenders nearing release. In addition, reentry program planners should continue to focus on assisting offenders in finding stable employment upon release. Also, more attention should be given to staff characteristics and the techniques they use to deliver reentry services. Data for this study were obtained with a self-report questionnaire administered to 496 inmates within 90 days of possible release from custody in work release centers and general population institutions. 11 tables and 63 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Aftercare decisionmaking; BJA Grant-related Documents; Corrections effectiveness; Inmate attitudes; Post-release programs; Prerelease centers; Prerelease programs; Program implementation; West Virginia; Work release
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.