skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220130 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Discussion of Incarceration and Its Alternatives in North Carolina
Corporate Author: North Carolina Governor's Crime Cmssn
Criminal Justice Analysis Ctr
United States of America
Date Published: July 2007
Page Count: 25
Sponsoring Agency: North Carolina Governor's Crime Cmssn
Raleigh, NC 27609
Sale Source: North Carolina Governor's Crime Cmssn
Criminal Justice Analysis Ctr
1201 Front Street, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609
United States of America
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In an examination of strategies to reduce incarceration expenses in North Carolina, this paper compares the costs associated with incarceration and the costs associated with established alternatives to incarceration.
Abstract: In order to alleviate the current strain on North Carolina’s prison population, avert a projected prison overcrowding crisis, and eliminate the need for costly prison construction, more funding should be directed to expanding the use of community-based alternatives to incarceration. Endorsing the full implementation of the remaining five recommendations of the Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission which were drafted specifically to avoid constructing additional prisons, would be a primary goal for reducing the costs associated with Department of Corrections managed individuals. These five recommendations are: (1) restructure the prior record level point ranges in order to expand the points in Prior Record Level 1 and even out the remaining ranges; (2) make the increase in sentence lengths between prior record levels more proportionate using a set percentage (15 percent) increment; the current sentence lengths in Prior Record Level 1 in each offense class would remain unchanged, serving as an anchor; (3) reallocate 3 months from the minimum sentence of Classes B1 through E to the maximum sentence; (4) punish habitual felons three classes higher than the offense classification for the principal offense, but in no case higher than Class C and require an active sentence; and (5) reclassify statutory rape or sexual offense of a person who is 13, 14 or 15 years old by a defendant who is more than 4 years but less than 6 years older from Class C to Class F. Additional suggestions are presented in the area of criminal justice and correction reforms, as well as prevention (i.e., increase existing programs) and intervention (i.e., juvenile day reporting centers with a therapeutic component). The skyrocketing public cost of incarceration in North Carolina is of great concern. The stabilization of the crime rate implies there is a diminishing return from incarcerating certain populations. Tables, figures, references
Main Term(s): Corrections costs
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Construction costs; Corrections effectiveness; Cost effectiveness analysis; Male female offender comparisons; North Carolina; Prison conditions; Prison overcrowding; State correctional facilities; State Corrections Commissions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.