skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220252 Find in a Library
Title: Twenty-Five Most Serious Errors Made by Police Hostage and Crisis Negotiators
Journal: Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations  Volume:7  Issue:2  Dated:2007  Pages:107-116
Author(s): James L. Greenstone Ed.D., J.D.
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 10
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article lists 25 serious mistakes that should be avoided or corrected in police hostage and crisis negotiations, and suggestions are offered for how to prevent or correct each error.
Abstract: Among the errors listed are choosing the wrong negotiator for the specific negotiations, not understanding the type of situation to be negotiated, timing the negotiations incorrectly, not making meaningful contact with the other party, failing to use appropriate intelligence intelligently, and failure to keep all parties focused on problem solving. Other errors listed are not recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of the other side, not understanding the mind-set of the other party, ignoring safety issues, negotiating without sufficient time, not knowing when to walk away from the negotiations, and negotiating without understanding one's primary objective. Also mentioned are the following errors: failure to understand the interests of the other side, not appreciating the validity of an argument, having no sense of alternatives to negotiations, failure to understand the nature of the relationships among the parties, using ineffective communication skills/techniques, and proceeding without knowing the willingness and ability of the parties to make and keep their commitments. The remaining errors listed are entering negotiations without considering options, approaching negotiations without first analyzing the perspectives of all parties to the bargaining, taking the attitude of "winner takes all" while "loser takes nothing," adding information to the negotiations, failure to practice negotiation skills, treating the negotiations as an individual rather than a team process, and failure to remember and avoid the other 24 errors. 1 figure and 4 suggested resources
Main Term(s): Police hostage negotiations training
Index Term(s): Hostage negotiations; Hostage takers; Hostages; Police crisis intervention; Police hostage-negotiation units
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.