skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220340 Find in a Library
Title: Differentiating Among Racial/Ethnic Groups and Its Implications for Understanding Juvenile Justice Decision Making
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:35  Issue:5  Dated:September/October 2007  Pages:471-484
Author(s): Michael J. Leiber; Joseph Johnson; Kristan Fox; Robyn Lacks
Date Published: September 2007
Page Count: 14
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the effects of race/ethnicity on the juvenile justice decisionmaking process for Whites, African-Americans, Native-Americans, Asian-Americans, and those labeled as multiracial.
Abstract: Research revealed that the juvenile justice decisionmaking process was impacted by the race/ethnicity of the youth, and that being a minority youth, in some instances, impacted the decisionmaking differently than if the youth was White. Asian-American youth received more severe outcomes than White youth, and in some cases, other minorities. Even though Asian-Americans were less likely to be released at intake and more likely to be adjudicated delinquent than their White counterparts, Native-Americans and African-Americans were also found to be the recipients of differential treatment even after consideration of legal and extralegal factors. Furthermore, being African-American individually or in combination with the number of charges at the time of the referral impacted decisionmaking at three decisionmaking outcomes while being Native-American or Asian-American increased the likelihood of receiving differential outcomes at two of the four decisionmaking stages. The factors of crime as a social problem, inequality, racial inequality, concentrated neighborhood disadvantage, and immigration interrelate and link to segregation, family disruption, and subculture adaptations (such as shadow cultures, and street codes of conduct). These factors combined with social isolation from lack of sustained interaction with individuals and institutions from mainstream society, will most likely continue to develop and foster stereotypes that shape decisionmakers perceptions of minorities as “threatening,” increasing the likelihood of State intervention. There is a need to differentiate among minority youth to fully capture the relative influence each racial/ethnic group might have on decisionmaking and social control. This study used secondary analysis from all case referrals for delinquency acts and probation violations (3,777 cases in sample) in 2 juvenile court jurisdictions in a northwestern State. Tables, notes, references
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice standards; Juvenile justice system
Index Term(s): Juvenile justice personnel attitudes; Minority juvenile offenders; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.