skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220382 Find in a Library
Title: Children's Live and Videotaped Testimonies: How Presentation Mode Affects Observers' Perception, Assessment and Memory
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:12  Issue:Part 2  Dated:September 2007  Pages:333-347
Author(s): Sara Landstrom; Par Anders Granhag; Maria Hartwig
Date Published: September 2007
Page Count: 15
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study investigated how two different presentation modes (live vs. video) of children’s testimonies affected observers’ perception, authenticity assessments, and memory of children’s appearance and statements.
Abstract: Results of the study concur with previous findings in that adults’ ability to assess children’s genuineness is mediocre, and adults assessing children’s genuineness seem to focus more on the verbal aspects than on the nonverbal. The study extends previous research by showing that live observers focus more on the verbal aspects of the statements than video observers. In addition, (live vs. video) observers perceived the children in more positive terms. Also, (live vs. video) observers believed they had a better memory of the children’s statements, and that this belief was warranted. In many cases where children are alleged victims, their testimony is the sole piece of evidence, due to the lack of medical and other physical evidence. This study investigated two modes of presentations used in courts: live and videotaped testimonies. The study sought to investigate whether observers perceived, assessed and remembered children’s live and video-based testimonies differently. In addition, observers’ ability to distinguish between children’s truthful and deceptive testimonies was investigated. Also, children’s experience of being evaluated (by adult observers) when interviewed about a self-experienced event versus an event that they lied about having experienced was examined. Fourteen children age 10 to 11 years old who had experienced an event or learned about the event by hearsay testified about the event 2 weeks later. Mock jurors watched the children’s testimonies both live and on video, rated their perception of the children’s statement and appearance, and assessed the children’s veracity. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Children in the courtroom
Index Term(s): Child victim interviews; Juvenile witnesses; Testimony; Video taped testimony; Witness credibility
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.