skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220559 Find in a Library
Title: Interrogation Strategies for an Unconventional Extremist Enemy
Journal: Polygraph  Volume:36  Issue:3  Dated:2007  Pages:121-132
Author(s): Philip A. Mullenix
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 12
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article presents an overview of strategies for the interrogation of extremist terrorist suspects.
Abstract: The interrogation of extremist terrorist suspects is a challenge beyond one’s conventional experience. The demands are unique because the perceptions, sensibilities, and moral compass of the offenders are far removed from Western society. Despite these challenges and immense ideological gulfs, the fact remains that there are fundamental human characteristics common to all. Those characteristics include emotional and intellectual vulnerabilities which are to be exploited to the fullest, with due regard for basic human rights, during the interrogation of terrorists. Against that background, the interrogator’s professionalism needs not be compromised, just sharpened. One caution is to never engage in a tactic which degrades the interrogator’s own self respect. This article outlines four strategies when interrogating extremist terrorist suspects. The first strategy is the assessment of the subject. There are three principal groupings of subjects for purposes of this discussion, on the selection and application of strategies for the interrogation of extremist terrorist suspects: (1) Common Criminals; (2) Nationalists; and (3) Islamic Fundamentalists. The second strategy reflects the interrogator’s conduct. The interrogator should prepare intellectually for various degrees of initial resistance and the frustration or anger which subjects often attempt to ignite in their interrogator. In addition, the interrogator should establish a rapport with the subject, convey self assurance, self respect and respect for the subject, and anticipate a lengthy interrogation. The third strategy is the preliminary interview which is a time to assess the subject’s strengths, vulnerabilities, communication patterns, attitudes, and truthfulness. The fourth and final strategy is the accusatory investigation. During this time, the interrogator turns up the pressure on the subject to obtain a confession. References
Main Term(s): Suspect interrogation
Index Term(s): Interrogation procedures; Interrogation training; Interview and interrogation; Long-term imprisonment; Revolutionary or terrorist groups; Terrorism/Mass Violence; Terrorist ideologies
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.