skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220595 Add to Shopping cart 
Title: Juvenile Transfer Laws: An Effective Deterrent to Delinquency?
Author(s): Richard E. Redding
Date Published: August 2008
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2005F-065
Sale Source: Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper reports on studies that have examined the deterrent effect of juvenile transfer laws, i.e., laws that require the transfer of juveniles charged with specified crimes from processing in juvenile court to adult criminal court.
Abstract: The author concludes that the bulk of the empirical evidence suggests that transfer laws, as currently implemented, probably have little general deterrent effect on would-be juvenile offenders. Transfer laws have produced the unintended effect of increasing recidivism for juveniles who have been transferred, thereby promoting life-course criminality. Experts have identified several possible explanations for the higher recidivism rates of violent juvenile offenders tried in criminal court compared to those adjudicated in juvenile court. These include the stigmatization and other negative effects of labeling juveniles as convicted felons; the sense of resentment and injustice juveniles feel about being tried and punished as adults; the learning of criminal values and behavior while incarcerated with adult offenders; and the decreased focus on rehabilitation and family support in the adult system. A felony conviction also results in the loss of a number of civil rights and privileges, further reducing the opportunities for employment and community reintegration. These findings suggest that educating judges, prosecutors, court personnel, and legislators about the research on the ineffectiveness of transfer laws may reduce the number of cases transferred to criminal court or the number of transferred cases that result in criminal sanctions. The studies reviewed for this paper were recently funded by the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. In addition to discussing the research findings regarding the effectiveness of these laws in deterring serious juvenile crime, this paper also reviews the rationale and content of State juvenile transfer laws. 5 notes and 66 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile court waiver
Index Term(s): Deterrence effectiveness; Juvenile processing; Juvenile Recidivism; OJJDP grant-related documents; Recidivism causes
Note: OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin, downloaded August 26, 2008.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.