skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 220614 Find in a Library
Title: Gender and Policing: Do Women Accept Legal Restrictions More Than Their Male Counterparts?
Journal: Women & Criminal Justice  Volume:18  Issue:1/2  Dated:2006  Pages:49-78
Author(s): John A. Eterno
Date Published: 2006
Page Count: 30
Publisher: http://www.haworthpressinc.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This research studied similarities and differences between male and female officers’ legal behaviors.
Abstract: The results of the study showed that when male and female officers were compared, there were both similarities and differences in their behaviors; the differences depended on the type of situation to which officers were responding. Many police departments throughout the world have emulated the New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) Compstat model of policing, instituted in 1994. The Compstat model is an aggressive crime-fighting model that stresses the traditional masculine aspects of policing, namely arrests and summonses. Community policing is the contrasting model that stresses utilizing other city services, and making close contacts with community members to tackle root causes of crime. Compstat returns policing to a male dominated model of crime fighting and law enforcement, rather than the community policing focus of problem solving and service. The research used the factorial survey method on 1,259 New York City police officers (234 female officers) to study and compare male/female police officers’ attitudes and legal behaviors. In drug situations, both women and men used legal criteria equally to determine whether a search should be executed. In weapons situations, women were more likely to follow legal restrictions even though men were somewhat influenced by them as well. Additionally, only men were influenced by a predisposed attitude of selectiveness in the weapon situation. Research showed no difference between men and women officers in aggression. However, research suggested that men who were more interested in serious violations (more selective) executed searches more often in a weapons situation. Women officers were not significantly influenced by this attitude, but tended to be more influenced by legal criteria in the weapons situation compared to men. Tables, references, appendix
Main Term(s): Gender issues; Male female police performance comparisons; Problem-Oriented Policing; Search and seizure; Urban policing
Index Term(s): Behavior; Community policing; Police legal limitations; Police legal training; Police women
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242438

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.