skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220654 Find in a Library
Title: Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders: The Importance of Gender-Responsive Needs
Journal: Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice  Volume:23  Issue:4  Dated:November 2007  Pages:310-340
Author(s): Emily M. Wright; Emily J. Salisbury; Patricia Van Voorhis
Date Published: November 2007
Page Count: 31
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Corrections
Washington, DC 20534
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, OH 45221
Grant Number: NIC-DOJ 03C25CIZ2;04C29GJD4;05C38GJF8;06WOI0IGJL0
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the role that gender-responsive needs play in women’s adjustment to prison.
Abstract: Results suggest that gender-responsive needs are predictive of institutional misconducts in prison; these gender-responsive needs performed as well as, and in some instances slightly better, than gender-neutral needs when predicting institutional misbehavior. In particular, childhood abuse, unsupportive relationships, experiencing anxiety or depression, and psychosis were highly related to the likelihood that a woman might incur institutional misconducts within 6 and 12 months of incarceration. Gender-responsive risk assessment instruments are best used in treatment-intensive settings, including regional, community-based correctional centers focused on wrap-around services and facilities where inmate transition is a priority. States that reserve some facilities for intensive programming and others for more limited approaches to low-risk offenders might also benefit from these systems because the assessments also differentiate between high-need and low-need inmates. The nature of the risk factors observed in this research might also suggest that prisons potentially need to re-evaluate policies and conditions that aggravate trouble inmates. Trauma-informed policies, family reunification, improved mental health services, and enhanced staff skills for managing women offenders all appear to be warranted. Data collection and analyses were funded by the National Institute of Corrections (NIC). The sample consisted of 272 newly admitted women offenders to the Missouri Department of Corrections from February 2004 through July 2004. Followup data describing the incidence and prevalence of prison misconduct were obtained between August 2004 and July 2005. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Inmate classification; Offender classification; Offender reclassification; Women's correctional institutions
Index Term(s): Criminogenic commodities; Female offenders; Inmate misconduct; Misconduct; Prediction; Risk management
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.