skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220749 Find in a Library
Title: Make Police Oversight Independent and Transparent
Journal: Criminology & Public Policy  Volume:6  Issue:4  Dated:November 2007  Pages:747-754
Author(s): Jack R. Greene
Date Published: November 2007
Page Count: 8
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper argues that because the police draw their authority and legitimacy from the communities they police, transparent and independent review of this trust is required.
Abstract: Such oversight is also consistent with democratic conceptions of the rule of law, which requires that the law be visible, transparent, and managed through overlapping institutions that provide sufficient checks and balances for ensuring legal compliance and democratic consensus. Transparency requires that police policies be clearly stated and disseminated to the public. Independent review of the police requires that the policies themselves and the compliance of the department and individual officers with those policies be examined by a body of citizens independent of the police. This is required in order to ensure that police actions comply with the law and are substantively fair. Collectively, research studies as well as national and local commissions on police misconduct highlight the insular and often hostile nature of the police culture toward individuals and groups outside of its own organization. Four models of police oversight have been identified from the literature and field practice: an external investigation and review model; the use of internal investigation conducted by the police with external review conducted by others; the use of professional monitors, ombudspersons, or auditors who are external to the police agency but who work with the police; and hybrids of the first three models. Although each of these models has strengths and weaknesses, they are all grounded in concepts of transparency and independence in the investigation and decisionmaking about complaints regarding police misconduct. 19 references
Main Term(s): Complaints against police
Index Term(s): Civilian Review Boards; Complaint processing; Complaints against police; Research uses in policymaking
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.