skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 220752 Find in a Library
Title: Collect and Release Data on Coercive Police Actions
Journal: Criminology & Public Policy  Volume:6  Issue:4  Dated:November 2007  Pages:773-780
Author(s): Robert J. Kane
Date Published: November 2007
Page Count: 8
Publisher: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This essay argues that all police departments should collect comprehensive data on all coercive activities of their officers, including disciplinary actions, and make these data available to the public with minimal editing and commentary.
Abstract: Many, if not most, U.S. police departments do not systematically collect data on coercive officer actions and their outcome. When they do collect such data, many departments do not review the data for accuracy and consistency. Typically, data on a department's use of force, including deadly force, are compiled only in response to mandated inquiries associated with a publicized use-of-force incident and/or the threat of coming under Federal control. Further, when such data are kept by departments, including citizen complaints about officer use of force, they are viewed as for the private use of departments for the purposes of monitoring and managing personnel actions. This practice violates the principles of the democratic process, which gives priority to the transparency of government actions that bear upon the rights and safety guaranteed to the citizenry. The public has authorized the police to carry arms and other coercive weapons in order to facilitate their law enforcement and public-safety efforts. The public has a right to know how a police department and its sworn officers are using weapons and coercive actions in the course of performing services to and for the citizenry. Not all information, however, should be made readily available to the public, particularly when it relates to ongoing investigations, but the burden of proof is on police departments to justify withholding from the public any information on police actions. 16 references
Main Term(s): Police use of deadly force
Index Term(s): Complaints against police; Information dissemination; Lawful use of force; Police records; Public information
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242581

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.