skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 220837 
Title: Principles of Forensic Identification Science (From Handbook of Criminal Investigation, P 303-337, 2007, Tim Newburn, Tom Williamson, and Alan Wright, eds. -- See NCJ-220829)
Author(s): A.P.A. Broeders
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 35
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.isbs.com 
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This chapter examines the nature and reliability of forensic sciences that trace biological material left at a crime scene to specific individuals.
Abstract: Forensic identification science involves an analysis of the characteristics of trace material found at a crime scene and the development of a probability estimate that the material was left at the scene by a particular person. It is a misconception however, that forensic science can provide an absolute determination that a particular person deposited a given sample of trace evidence at a location. Although fingerprint and DNA analysis can show a high probability that a particular individual left particular trace evidence at a scene, neither science can make absolute claims of identification. Currently, DNA analysis is the only type of forensic analysis that can calculate the probability that a particular DNA sample was left by a specific individual. Forensic identification scientists are ultimately making a subjective judgment in reaching a categorical decision about the identity of a source for trace evidence; however, there is no absolute scientific certainty of the source. There is always some degree of chance that another unknown person with characteristics very similar to the known suspect could have left the trace material. It is up to the trier of fact (judge or jury) to determine whether there is reasonable doubt, considering all the evidence presented, that the defendant left the trace evidence at the scene. 15 notes and 56 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): DNA fingerprinting; Expert witnesses; Fingerprints; Foreign police; Forensic sciences; Latent fingerprints; Probabilistic evidence; Suspect identification; Technical experts; Trace evidence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242667

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.