skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220850 
Title: Miscarriages of Justice (From Handbook of Criminal Investigation, P 610-627, 2007, Tim Newburn, Tom Williamson, and Alan Wright, eds. -- See NCJ-220829)
Author(s): Stephen P. Savage; Becky Milne
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 18
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: In examining the relationship between "miscarriages of justice" (questionable convictions and failure to initiate appropriate justice actions) and the police investigative process in Great Britain, this chapter focuses on the role of police investigative processes in causing miscarriages of justice and the role of miscarriages of justice in shaping the investigative process itself.
Abstract: The chapter argues that the process of premature closure of evidence collection and the thorough and objective collection of evidence and consideration of suspects is a root factor in many cases of miscarriages of justice. The chapter also considers how some of the measures designed to counter premature closure, such as formalized case review, have been imposed on the investigative process as a result of key cases of miscarriages of justice. An initiative under the British Police Reform Act 2002 was the Professionalizing the Investigative Process (PIP) program, which was formally launched by the Association of Chief Police Officers in 2005. The aim of PIP is to enhance the investigative process through training and development of those involved in criminal investigation. As indicated in the Core Investigative Doctrine, this is to be achieved by providing training in and assessment of professional investigative procedures designed to assist investigators in making accountable decisions and minimizing the chance of errors. The effectiveness of these and other attempts to improve investigations may fall short of their objectives, however, if they are not based on research efforts that address what constitutes a "good detective" and a "good investigation." Such research might focus on what went wrong in the investigation of known cases of miscarriages of justice. 42 references
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Criminal investigation training; Foreign police; Investigative techniques; Police criminal investigation training
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.