skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 220851 
Title: Professionalizing Criminal Investigation (From Handbook of Criminal Investigation, P 628-651, 2007, Tim Newburn, Tom Williamson, and Alan Wright, eds. -- See NCJ-220829)
Author(s): Peter Stelfox
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Publisher: http://www.isbs.com 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This chapter examines the professionalization of criminal investigation under the British Government's Professionalizing Criminal Investigation Program (PIP).
Abstract: In the past, police leaders generally held the view that the investigation of crime required few skills in addition to the training required for general police work. This view was reinforced by research conducted in the late 1970s and early 1980s that concluded crimes were solved because members of the public provided the police with key information in the early stages of the investigation. Absent such information, it is unlikely that the crime will be detected by additional police efforts. The implication drawn from these studies is that because crime-solving depends on information provided by the public, changes in police activity or an increase in resources will make little difference in case outcomes. There are three main reasons why police leaders are now convinced that criminal investigation requires a separate regime of professionalization within the police services. These reasons are changes to the legal framework for criminal investigations under British law, technological and procedural advances in the investigation process, and concerns over police effectiveness and conduct in criminal investigations. These changes require that police investigators acquire additional knowledge of legal parameters for investigations as well as investigative principles and techniques based in research and technological advances in investigative tools, in addition to a range of practical skills in conducting investigations. PIP addresses this need for investigative professionalization by providing a training curriculum for investigators that takes them from the basic levels of investigation to the most complex. This chapter argues, however, that PIP is incomplete because it lacks a capacity to evaluate the operational effectiveness of professional practice. 3 tables, 1 figure, and 83 references
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Criminal investigation training; Foreign police; Police criminal investigation training; Police professionalism; Police reform; Professionalization
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242681

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.