skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220909 Find in a Library
Title: Kentucky Goes Binary: 0100101101011001
Journal: Corrections Today  Volume:69  Issue:5  Dated:October 2007  Pages:46-48
Author(s): Scott A. Haas
Date Published: October 2007
Page Count: 3
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes how the Medical Division of the Kentucky Department of Corrections (DOC) was able to meet a mandate to select an electronic medical record (EMR), a computerized system designed to capture and display patient-specific clinical information.
Abstract: This required selecting an EMR that would meet the unique needs of a correctional medical environment and implement that system in all 13 State facilities within 15 months. Using a memorandum of agreement already in place with the University of Kentucky, the DOC invited several vendors to demonstrate and discuss their EMR systems. Vendors were provided with the expectations and flexibility requirements of the DOC. Within 1 month, a vendor was selected, and the process of primary platform implementations was initiated. After 15 months, all 13 State facilities were equipped with a functioning EMR. The two most pertinent characteristics of the selected system were Web-based applicability and feature flexibility. One of the most prominent operational benefits of the EMR is the eContact, which allows for consultation to be provided to the primary care provider in the facility by a group of off-site specialists at the University of Kentucky Medical Center. The author advises that before opening discussions with vendors, consultations should be conducted with correctional administrators from other States who have undergone the process of selecting and implementing an EMR, so as to identify the benefits and problems associated with particular EMR features. 1 figure, 1 table and 2 notes
Main Term(s): Correctional information systems
Index Term(s): Computer aided operations; Correctional Records Information System; Inmate health; Inmate health care; Kentucky
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.