skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220941 Find in a Library
Title: Attitudes of Police Executives Toward Miranda and Interrogation Policies
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:97  Issue:3  Dated:Spring 2007  Pages:873-942
Author(s): Marvin Zalman; Brad W. Smith
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 70
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper presents the results of a survey of top administrators from large American municipal police departments on interrogation law and practice, specifically their attitudes toward Miranda and interrogation policies.
Abstract: Major findings from the survey include: (1) most big city police administrators do not wish to overturn Miranda; officers in their departments complied with Miranda rules and administrators agreed with the results of the majority opinions in both United States versus Patane and Missouri versus Siebert; (2) administrators disagreed with the practice of deliberately evading Miranda rules known as interrogation “outside Miranda;” (3) three-quarters of the respondents disagreed with the proposition that aggressive psychological interrogation causes false confessions; (4) three-fifths of big city police administrators favored the videotaping of interrogation sessions; and (5) disciplining officers for Miranda violations is uncommon. The survey indicates “wholesale” compliance with legal rules designed to guide police interrogations. However, support for violations is sufficient to be of concern for a legal system that wants changes in Miranda law. Important issues of confessions law and police interrogation practices are presently on the constitutional and public agendas. This study provides baseline opinion data of big city police administrators concerning important contemporary issues having to do with interrogation and confessions. It sheds light on the level of information held by police administrators about confessions law and provides first-time data on lawsuits and administrative controls surrounding interrogation methods. The survey provides information about three controversial issues: interrogation practices that can subvert Miranda, methods that may induce false confessions, and videotaping interrogations. Tables, appendix
Main Term(s): Interview and interrogation
Index Term(s): Coercive persuasion of offenders; Confessions; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Interrogation procedures; Miranda rights; Police attitudes; Police legal limitations; Police responsibilities; Rights of the accused; Suspect interrogation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.