skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220977 Find in a Library
Title: Does Contextual Information Affect Expert Opinions?: Recent Research
Author(s): Angela Lack
Date Published: July 2006
Page Count: 3
Sponsoring Agency: National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law
Gulfport, FL 33707
Document: HTML
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article details study determining if contextual information affects expert opinions.
Abstract: This study reveals that fingerprint examiners using the generally accepted method of latent print identification, ACE-V which stands for: analysis, comparison, evaluation, and verification, are vulnerable to irrelevant and misleading contextual influences. Dr. Itiel Dror of the University of Southhampton and his colleagues set out to prove that context does affect the outcomes; they concluded that their “findings of inconsistent identification decisions may reflect cognitive flaws and limitations in conducting objective and independent processing of the information,” and calls for further research to examine these issues in greater depth. Although the study was conducted with only five fingerprint examiners, it was the first conducted in the real world conditions of the criminal justice system; four out of five of the fingerprint examiners in the study changed their prior identifications. Dr. Dror’s study used the background of the fingerprint found in the Madrid train bombing to create the context. On March 11, 2004, as a pretext, Dr. Dror asked several examiners to analyze the prints from a mistaken identity case derived from a fingerprint collected at the Madrid bomb scene, the Brandon Mayfield case. The study was designed to provide empirical data on whether fingerprint experts were susceptible to extraneous contextual influences when working in normal routines and environments. Five fingerprint experts were selected from an international pool of volunteers from fingerprint bureaus, agencies, and laboratories all over the world. According to Dror’s study, emotional context and subliminal messages increased the likelihood of match judgments when fingerprints were ambiguous, thus concluding that contextual information actively biases the way gaps are filled. When fingerprints were clearly not a match, the same contextual information did not influence the participants to conclude that a match existed. The National Institute of Justice will fund six future fingerprint studies. References
Main Term(s): Evidence identification; Evidence technicians; Technical experts
Index Term(s): Expert witnesses; Fingerprints; Investigations
Note: Downloaded December 20, 2007
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.