skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221054 Find in a Library
Title: Organization of Correctional Education Services
Journal: Journal of Correctional Education  Volume:58  Issue:4  Dated:December 2007  Pages:323-336
Author(s): Thom Gehring
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 14
Type: Historical Overview; Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes and critiques the major types of correctional education organizations over the centuries, with attention to the three modern organizational patterns that can be implemented throughout a correctional system.
Abstract: Historically, there have been five systems for the delivery of correctional education: Sabbath schools, the traditional or decentralized pattern, correctional education bureaus, correctional school districts (CSDs), and integral education. Sabbath schools were terminated because they violated the constitutional mandate of the separation of church and state. Integral education, which focuses on the personality of the learner, is not practical for implementation throughout an entire jurisdiction. The remaining three systems constitute the three modern correctional education models (decentralized, bureau, and CSD). In a decentralized organization, line authority extends from the institutional administration, through the education director or principal, to the teaching staff. In a bureau organization, line authority is similar to that of the decentralized administration. Staff authority extends from the State director of correctional education (sometimes through a staff of statewide supervisors) through the principal to the teaching staff. In a CSD organization, line authority extends from a jurisdictionwide superintendent of schools, who is qualified according to the standards of other school district superintendents, through the principal, to the teaching staff. The CSD is the current state-of-the art model. It is the only model that corresponds with the predominant and traditional approach for organizing public schooling throughout the United State, i.e., through school districts that are responsible for ensuring that education standards are consistent with community interests. There is a substantial literature that documents CSD effectiveness, but additional work is required in order to maximize the effectiveness of correctional education under the CSD system. 5 figures and 17 references
Main Term(s): Corrections education
Index Term(s): Correctional education programs; Correctional organization; Corrections management; Corrections policies; Organization studies
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.