skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221077 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Reducing Violent Crime and Firearms Violence: The Indianapolis Lever-Pulling Experiment
Author(s): Steven Chermak Ph.D.
Date Published: December 2006
Page Count: 224
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
Grant Number: 2003-IJ-CX-1038
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the methodology and findings of a program ("lever-pulling") in Indianapolis intended to reduce violence in general and firearms violence in particular.
Abstract: Evaluation findings show that "lever-pulling" as implemented in Indianapolis had little effect on the probationers involved. Meetings held with individuals at risk for violence in order to communicate to them the intent of law enforcement officers and the courts to focus on and punish (lever-pulling) violent behavior was effective in disrupting their perceptions of risk related to being apprehended and punished severely for violent crimes. The treatment probationers (probationers exposed to the meetings) and control probationers (those not exposed to the meetings) committed similar types of offenses after the program was implemented. Specifically, there were no significant differences in self-reported gun activities between the treatment and control groups. Further, the number and type of probation technical violations following the meeting were not different between the treatment and control groups. In addition, the treatment probationers were not more likely to take advantage of community programming following the meeting, but they were less likely to miss meetings with their probation officers. Finally, there was little evidence that a consistent range of "levers" (sanctions) were "pulled" after the meeting. The "call in" meetings were the primary mechanism used to alter probationers' behavior. The intent of the program was to communicate directly with chronically violent offenders about new efforts to address their crimes and use all available legal sanctions ("levers") when they committed violent offenses. The evaluation used an experimental design. Probationers were randomly assigned to two types of meetings (law enforcement and community) or to a control group over the 6 months between June 2003 and March 2004. All felony probationers convicted of 13 violent, drug, gun, and property offenses were eligible. Tables, figures, and 67 references
Main Term(s): Effectiveness of crime prevention programs
Index Term(s): Deterrence effectiveness; Firearm-crime relationships; Firearms; Indiana; NIJ final report; Violence prevention
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.