skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221128 Find in a Library
Title: Perceptions of Motives in Intimate Partner Violence: Expressive Versus Coercive Violence
Journal: Violence and Victims  Volume:22  Issue:5  Dated:2007  Pages:563-576
Author(s): John Hamel MSW; Sarah L. Desmarais; Tonia L. Nicholls
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 14
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined perceptions of motives in the perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV).
Abstract: Results provide empirical support for the existence of a gender bias within the field of domestic violence to minimize intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrated by women. That is, given the same set of facts, domestic violence professionals rated male-perpetrated violence as more coercive and intentional and female-perpetrated violence as more expressive. To the extent that expressive motives are supported to indicate a lesser threat, female-perpetrated IPV is therefore assumed to be less serious than male-perpetrated IPV. As a result, the issue of motives in IPV appears to be a complicated one, not amenable to simple answers. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree to which expressive and coercive motives were attributed to IPV perpetrated by men and women in a variety of contexts. It was hypothesized that female perpetrators would be judged to have a higher proportion of expressive motivation. However, perceptions were expected to differ by respondent gender. The study sample consisted of 401 males and females, primarily mental health professionals. Figures, notes, references and appendix
Main Term(s): Domestic assault
Index Term(s): Confrontation tactics; Dating Violence; Discrimination; Gender issues; Individual behavior; Male female offender comparisons; Motivation; Self defense; Violence; Violence causes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.