skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221169 Find in a Library
Title: Comparison Question: Should Photographic Documentation be a Standard Operating Procedure for all Firearm and Toolmark Examinations?
Journal: Evidence Technology Magazine  Volume:5  Issue:6  Dated:November/December 2007  Pages:12-15,45
Author(s): Dale Garrison
Date Published: November 2007
Page Count: 5
Publisher: http://www.wordsmithpublishing.com/ 
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines issues in the debate about whether photographic documentation should be a standard operating procedure for all firearm and toolmark examinations.
Abstract: The call to require photographic documentation is part of a recent trend throughout forensics, particularly in the pattern-matching disciplines such as firearm and tool mark comparisons. On the other hand, Robert J. Shem, a firearm and toolmark examiner with the Alaska Department of Public Safety's Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory believes that it is best to allow qualified examiners to make their own decisions on the issue of documentation. He argues that any changes in standard procedure should fit well into the examiner's workflow and must work in all cases. Regarding the latter issue, Shem argues that photographic documentation does not always provide an accurate representation of what the examiner is seeing. Theoretically, a photograph should illustrate striae on two different bullets and show where they do and do not match. Shem believes that this two-dimensional comparison of striae on a rounded bullet does not accurately portray the three-dimensional characteristics of bullets in a comparison. He notes that a complete analysis relies on the expert's human eye, which has a lot more range of detail in highlights and shadow than a camera. Shem is also concerned that the promotion of the two-dimensional counting of striae portrayed in photographs will result in a flawed comparison that ignores bullet feature not evident in a given photograph. Two leading organizations, the Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners and the Scientific Working Group of Firearms and Toolmarks, advocate a comprehensive approach that allows the examiner to choose the best forms of documentation in each circumstance.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Ballistics; Forensic sciences; Investigative techniques; Photography; Toolmark identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243031

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.