skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221180 Find in a Library
Title: Strategically Planning for Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices: Using Macro- and Micro-Strategies to Improve Success
Journal: Corrections Today  Volume:69  Issue:6  Dated:December 2007  Pages:34-36
Author(s): Donna L. Boone; Kimberly Gentry-Sperber
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 3
Publisher: http://www.aca.org/ 
Type: Report (Technical Assistance)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In this discussion of strategic planning for implementing evidence-based corrections practices (practices previously shown to be effective by evaluation research), this article focuses on the first three of six stages outlined by Dean Fixsen and his colleagues in their synthesis of the implementation literature: exploration and adoption, program installation, and initial implementation.
Abstract: This article uses experiences from the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDC) to provide examples of strategies that can be used in these stages. During the exploration and adoption stage of implementation, Fixsen et al. explain that an organization surveys existing practices for addressing the client need of interest (e.g., reoffending reduction) and whether the identified practices are feasible for the inquiring organization. At the completion of this phase, the VDC identified four new practices for implementation: motivational interviewing by all probation officers, a standardized risk/needs assessment tool, risk/need-driven case plan agreements, and risk-based supervision caseload assignments. In the installation phase for these evidence-based practices, the VDC selected pilot probation office sites for field testing the new practices, collecting information from the field officers about what worked and what additions were needed in order to fully implement the new practices. During the program installation phase, probation officers were trained in motivational interviewing, a new risk/needs assessment instrument was field-tested, and case-plan agreements were initiated. During the initial implementation, VDC staff learned that the new practices were receiving both support and criticism from probation personnel. The VDC then used "concept mapping" as a means of collecting group suggestions and applying quantitative methods in order to develop a list of priorities. This resulted in a detailed checklist that guided the VDC's implementation of the new practices. 1 table
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Change management; Correctional reform; Probation management; Probation officer attitudes; Probation or parole officers; Probation or parole services; Program Adaptability/Replication; Program design; Program evaluation; Program implementation; Program planning; Research uses in policymaking; Virginia
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243042

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.